"Ramjanmabhoomi disputed site, divided into three '

High Court following the Ayodhya site sharing portion of the map can be viewed
In a landmark decision by the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on the disputed site in Ayodhya, Ram's birthplace declared.
High Court majority decided that the disputed land is considered Aramjanmebhumi, gave it to Hindu groups. From there the statue of Ram lalla not be removed.
But the court also found that the parts on which Sita Ram platform and includes the kitchen, Nirmohi arena is also occupied part so it will remain near Nirmahi arena.
Two judges gave the decision of the court that the land on parts of the Muslim prayers are therefore a third of land given to Muslim factions. Full three-judge special bench of the full decision is about ten thousand pages. One third for Sunni waqf board
The three judges has dismissed the appeal of Central Waqf Board  because it was filed after time limit.Still, two judges, Justice SU Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal,considered Sunni Waqf Board as a third party.
Judges considered that the statues of Lord Rama were held on 22/23 December 1949 in the disputed mosque. It is believed that Babur built the mosque or on his orders was the birth place of Lord Rama.
The court has also considered how the ASI excavations have found remains of a huge ancient Mender, and  the mosque was built upon its Residue. But the three judges differed weather old temple were broken. To facilitate sharing of land acquired by the central government would include 70 acres of land. Ground for sharing trial are invited suggestions from all parties, after which the court will make the final decree. The center will remain status quo at the disputed site. Meanwhile, Sunni Waqf board has anounced to appeal to the Supreme Court. Beware of rumors: Manmohan Singh Afterdecision the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati has appealed to people to keep peace. She said that the disputed 67 acres of land is in central government custody, therefore the responsibility of implementation of the decision is upon the Centre itself. She said, "I have written a letter to Prime Minister in this matter." "Victory or defeat may not see as'  Not to be desperated by the dicision,Need not to take to street, two judges has believed that there was a mosque on the place but.............so, we will go to SC."said Zafaryaab jilani,lawer of Sunni Waqf Board.
Former U.P Chief Minister Kalyan Singh welcomed the decision but said that if land is not divided, so good. RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat said that the decision is not to be seen as victory or defeat. While other leader of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad Giriraj Kishore said that Muslims should hand over the case in Mathura and Kashi. Appeal for calm Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Home Minister P Chidambaram has urged all parties to keep the peace.
 High Court following the Ayodhya site sharing portion of the map can be viewed In a landmark decision by the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on the disputed site in Ayodhya, Ram's birthplace declared. High Court majority decided that the disputed land is Ramjanmebhumi and gave it to Hindu groups. From there the statue of Ram lalla not be removed.
But the court also found that the parts on which Sita Ram platform and includes the kitchen, Nirmohi Akhada is also occupied part so it will remain near Nirmahi Akhada.Two judges gave the decision of the court that the land on parts of the Muslim prayers are therefore a third of land given to Muslim factions.
"I'd welcome the decision and the decision in the name of the Babri Masjid is running will stop the political arena."said 90 - year-old Hashim Ansari one of thepetitioner in the case.