Be aware of breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most commonest problems among women.Reports say that one in fourteen female children born will develop breast cancer in their lifetime.Sixteen per cent of women aged between 40-60 years have breast-related problems and complain of breast lumps.
Its increasing rate in our country is a sorrowfull news.According to a report, three thousand women get breast cancer every year only  in Delhi while one thousand women die of breast cancer.Women in Delhi and other metros are more prone to breast cancer than women in rural areas.
As the month of October has been observed for the national breast cancer awareness month, making common people know about causes and cure of breast cancer is our duty.
How it starts
Initially, breast cancer may not cause any symptoms. A lump may be too small for you to feel or to cause any unusual changes you can notice on your own. Often, an abnormal area turns up on a screening mammogram (x-ray of the breast), which leads to further testing.
In some cases, however, the first sign of breast cancer is a new lump or mass in the breast that you or your doctor can feel. A lump that is painless, hard, and has uneven edges is more likely to be cancer. But sometimes cancers can be tender, soft, and rounded. So it's important to have anything unusual checked by your doctor.
According to the American Cancer Society, any of the following unusual changes in the breast can be a symptom of breast cancer:

• swelling of all or part of the breast
• skin irritation or dimpling
• breast pain
• nipple pain or the nipple turning inward
• redness, scaliness, or thickening of the nipple or breast skin
• a nipple discharge other than breast milk
• a lump in the underarm area.

"No temple was demoleshed for constructing the mosque"

That the court judgment on Ayodhya has finally been delivered and the initial reactions from all sections strike a distinct note of reconciliation is welcome.
The verdict says that the disputed land of 2.77 acers is to be divided eqally among the two Hindu plantifs, the Nirmohi Akhara and and The Bhagwan Shri Ram Birajman, the deity ragarded as a jurisdic as a jurisdic person that can own the property, and the Sunni Waqf bBoard.The portion of the inner courtyard where the central dome of the Babri Masjid stood before its demolition and where the makeshift temple now exist is to be given to Hindus.The rest of the area where the Babri Masjid stood, including part of the inner courtyard and some part of the outer courtyard, is to be alloted to the Waqf Board.The Nirmohi Akhara is to be alloted the building that sttod in the outer courtyard of the premises, including Ram Chabutra and Sita Rasoi, while it is to share the unbuilt area of the outer courtyard with Bhawan Shri Ram Birajman.

This is a Panchayat-Style decision to hold the religios peace rather than an exercise of legal reflection."this is a political decision not a court decision." says a senior advocate of SC.
Jistice S.U.  Khan and Justice Sudhir Agrwal has declared that no temple was demolished for constructing the mosque and the verdict is "as per faith and belief of Hindus."
I was tought earliar that court knows nothing except evidwnce and proof.But now, it has started to pronounce its decision on the base of someone's faith and belief.Then, Why is SATI-PRTHA legally banned?BALI should too because it is the best way to make angry goddess happy.AND the more important thing is:why was the Muslim faith not considered??They also believe that where the mosque has been built once the place will be sacred forever.

"Ramjanmabhoomi disputed site, divided into three '

High Court following the Ayodhya site sharing portion of the map can be viewed
In a landmark decision by the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on the disputed site in Ayodhya, Ram's birthplace declared.
High Court majority decided that the disputed land is considered Aramjanmebhumi, gave it to Hindu groups. From there the statue of Ram lalla not be removed.
But the court also found that the parts on which Sita Ram platform and includes the kitchen, Nirmohi arena is also occupied part so it will remain near Nirmahi arena.
Two judges gave the decision of the court that the land on parts of the Muslim prayers are therefore a third of land given to Muslim factions. Full three-judge special bench of the full decision is about ten thousand pages. One third for Sunni waqf board
The three judges has dismissed the appeal of Central Waqf Board  because it was filed after time limit.Still, two judges, Justice SU Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal,considered Sunni Waqf Board as a third party.
Judges considered that the statues of Lord Rama were held on 22/23 December 1949 in the disputed mosque. It is believed that Babur built the mosque or on his orders was the birth place of Lord Rama.
The court has also considered how the ASI excavations have found remains of a huge ancient Mender, and  the mosque was built upon its Residue. But the three judges differed weather old temple were broken. To facilitate sharing of land acquired by the central government would include 70 acres of land. Ground for sharing trial are invited suggestions from all parties, after which the court will make the final decree. The center will remain status quo at the disputed site. Meanwhile, Sunni Waqf board has anounced to appeal to the Supreme Court. Beware of rumors: Manmohan Singh Afterdecision the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati has appealed to people to keep peace. She said that the disputed 67 acres of land is in central government custody, therefore the responsibility of implementation of the decision is upon the Centre itself. She said, "I have written a letter to Prime Minister in this matter." "Victory or defeat may not see as'  Not to be desperated by the dicision,Need not to take to street, two judges has believed that there was a mosque on the place but.............so, we will go to SC."said Zafaryaab jilani,lawer of Sunni Waqf Board.
Former U.P Chief Minister Kalyan Singh welcomed the decision but said that if land is not divided, so good. RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat said that the decision is not to be seen as victory or defeat. While other leader of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad Giriraj Kishore said that Muslims should hand over the case in Mathura and Kashi. Appeal for calm Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Home Minister P Chidambaram has urged all parties to keep the peace.
 High Court following the Ayodhya site sharing portion of the map can be viewed In a landmark decision by the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on the disputed site in Ayodhya, Ram's birthplace declared. High Court majority decided that the disputed land is Ramjanmebhumi and gave it to Hindu groups. From there the statue of Ram lalla not be removed.
But the court also found that the parts on which Sita Ram platform and includes the kitchen, Nirmohi Akhada is also occupied part so it will remain near Nirmahi Akhada.Two judges gave the decision of the court that the land on parts of the Muslim prayers are therefore a third of land given to Muslim factions.
"I'd welcome the decision and the decision in the name of the Babri Masjid is running will stop the political arena."said 90 - year-old Hashim Ansari one of thepetitioner in the case.